Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS

Section 3, 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appellant was removed from service after serving with show cause notice, but on account of his alleged bad service record Without being questioned against them, where it is said that he has a bad reputation and in the past he was awarded minor convictions. There was no strong evidence to support his allegations of correctness that the appellant had a permanent reputation for corruption and was punished with the slightest charge of refusing to be an effective employee. In the past and last, the appellant stated that the appellant was convicted in 1994 while the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant were started in 2001 which would mean that the minor fines imposed on the appellant were already in Pakistan. The Railway Personal Manual Clause (iv) has expired; after the completion of this sentence if the Appellant is written on minor convictions under the Public Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973. For two years there will be no conviction of minor offenses which the appellant has already endured and which has already become a chapter and is closed. Is, twice the appeal can not have a desperate time for the appellant comes in double jeopardy principles. In the past, appellant's minor convictions could not even be used as a controversial piece of evidence because the appellant was not accused of any misconduct or misconduct after his termination of employment. Has been constituted when his power was exhausted by his minor convictions without having to inquire against him. how to become a advocate from Lodhran lawyer