Find a Lawyer

FAZIL UMAR versus FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, GHQ, RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (ii), and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A, 4 and 5 show the notice of appeal to the appellant from the lower penalty and mandatory retirement from service. After issuing and formal inquiry into the allegation, the appellant was reduced to a lower rank and fined that he was illegally absent from duty for 623 days without the formal sanction of his leave. He could not go to his office because of his illness and because of the law and order situation in the city, Waldetti Fact that the appellant is a patient with diabetes, he will not refrain from going to this office and the alleged law and order situation in the city. Will not be guaranteed. In the event of such a long and unauthorized absence, under the circumstances, the Tribunal was fully established, however, in the exercise of the powers under section 5 (1) of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, as amended and to the contrary The mandatory retirement sentence was retained for a period of two years property advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer