SHAHID KHAN versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS
Regulation No. 30 (1) (g) (iv) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 provides for the appellant with certain charges, such as discipline, violation of rules and regulations, misuse or misappropriation of funds. Was dismissed for acts like embezzlement. Etc. The appellant claimed that the disqualified authority had issued a charge sheet against him and he was not given the opportunity to examine the witnesses presented against him, even though he had been held against the appellant. Was done, but he examined the question and answer. They were denied against the appellant, conducting regular inquiries to give them full opportunity to examine the witnesses was absolutely necessary in this case, but the authorities did not inquire as per law, employment against the appellant. An order of dismissal was set aside and the matter was forwarded to the authorities to take disciplinary action against the appellant, taking strict notice. Appellant will be restored to his position mid-time with the CEO
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sialkot lawyer