JAVED AHMED versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 3, 5, 11 and 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Civil Aviation Authority Service Regulations, Regulation No. 5 27 Mandatory Retirement Appeal Mandatory to Appellant on certain charges under Regulation 5 27 of Civil Aviation Was retired on. Authority to issue service notices to service regulators and to terminate service-related licenses (special powers) after hearing Ordinance 2000 when disciplinary action against Appellant under Regulation 5 27 of the Civil Aviation Authority Service Regulations. The action was launched. The appellant was illegal, because the provisions of Articles 11 and 12 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, had the effect of enforcing another law under which the unlawful orders passed against the appellant were separated. Was re-employed and was remanded for a de novo action against the appellant strictly in accordance with the lawsuit W.W. The relevant law based on the same allegations.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kotla lawyer