Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MESSRS FARAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER AND 3 OTHERS

Employers were accused by the Complainant / Worker of Section Unf labor unfair practices that were terminated at the employment of Sugar Mills in the employers Sugar Sugar Mills, 2003 and when the next crushing season began in 2003. However, in 2004, the complainant went on duty, so it was not allowed to enter the mills and was denied employment. The complainant alleged that in doing so the employers committed unfair practices with the laborers. What was Seasonal appointment letter indicates that the complainant was appointed on a seasonal basis and in accordance with the terms and conditions of service. , The complainant's appointment was made on a purely temporary basis, which may be terminated without notice - upon completion of the Crushing Season 2002 2003, the terms and conditions of the Letter of Seasonal Appointment will terminate automatically. ? The complainant did not allege that the complainant was being victimized by any of his trade union activities and termination of his service, i.e. unfair practice with workers because of his trade union activities. Was. Complainant could not obtain permanent worker status Complainant failed to show that the provisions of Section 63 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance contained components of unfair labor practice if the complainant did not name any witnesses through the complaint Was taken, accordingly he was dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Kotla lawyer