Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIR AND OTHERS versus MESSRS HELIX PHARMA (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH NOTIFIED FACTORY MANAGER AND OTHERS

Section 10, 49 (4) (e) and 63 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) Claims for interim relief applicants against unfair labor by employees, who Claimed to be a permanent worker. The establishment had alleged that they had formed a trade union and had submitted a request to the registrar trade unions for registration. But the administration, which was against healthy trade union activities, was the victim and threatened to terminate their services under the provisions of section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. Threatened to terminate, could deal with inappropriate labor issues. In the employer's section the ordinance is described under section 63 under, if employees apply in this regard, it shows that they were employed by the employer. Workers also provide examples of alleged abuse by employees for their trade union activities. The date, month and year of their appointment with the Establishment did not specify, either in their application or in the affidavit, the applicants did not show their position or department where they were working, only on oral, In the absence of any document showing the appointment of the applicants, this claim cannot be said about them that the first party had established their employment before the establishment of the applicants to maintain their application before the Commission. Did not mention their exploits because of their trade union activities or any particular instance of them Except that the school was dismissed from his job pakistani advocates Ukba lawyer