UNITED BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION PAK1CTAN THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY versus MESSRS UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 2 OTHERS
Sections 49 (4) (e) and 20 (13) (b) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) unfair practice by employees interim relief applicant The petition for the petitioner, which was filed as an industry-wise federation, alleges that the respondent bank has filed several lawsuits against the applicants and their officials, so that the officials and applicants of the federation have their trade. Prevent union activities. That the respondents had paused for lunch and prayer time. Changed the medical facilities for the parents, disclosure of the holidays and the annual growth rate of the workers, thereby affecting the current working conditions of the workers. The applicant along with this application also filed for interim relief under Regulation 32 (2) (c) National Industrial Regulation (Procedure and Duties) Regulations, 1973 petitioner's petition against the respondents. I was charged with general charges and no specific instance was brought on record under which no evidence was required to prove the allegations leveled against the respondents, which the applicant did not produce. The medical facilities and other working conditions of the laborers were closed or imposed by the defendants; no charge by the defendants against any officer or member of the applicant federation without any supporting conditions. Sheet or showcase notice was not issued, will not make the first case for a grant was prayed for by a relief applicant even before industrialization.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
