Find a Lawyer

NAVEED IQBAL versus SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES, THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Section 22A (8) (g) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) by an employer serving as an electrician mechanic in the Department of Employers' Administration. Action was taken against unfair practice. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice and inquiry was made to steal the tube light vigilantes and other articles, the petitioner did not deny the recovery of the allegedly light tube outpost in his possession, but his version of it That he was taking the same to replace them in which the petitioner participated. In the inquiry against him and he examined the prosecution's testimony. The applicant admitted that he had signed every inquiry process. An allegation of misconduct against the worker's charge has been proved, and thus cannot be interrupted by the national industry within the Labor Relations Commission's jurisdiction to determine the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission. If inquiries were sought in connection with illegal or irregularities, any such interference was limited to abusing a worker by a trade union only. Activities by the employer to practice unfair labor. And to prevent it under the provisions of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, Regln 32 (2) (c) of 1973, when the matter did not fall within the scope of inappropriate labor practice. , The petition will not be admissible and the National Industrial Relations Commission may not accept the jurisdiction, as such application shall not be within its jurisdiction, nor in the application. law websites from Kotli Loharan lawyer