SYED NUSRAT NASIR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Sections 9 & 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Lawsuits and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Complaint against the litigant, the affected person is released as a scope collector performing his duties as additional collector customs. , Which happened later when another officer reopened the matter, was acquitted, after which, the owner of the vehicle filed a corruption complaint against another officer to the Federal Tax Ombudsman, who dismissed it. But in addition to the dismissal, he also recommended that the applicant be removed from the job. On the basis of instability, the applicant's position was that the unwanted recommendations were illegal and unlawful because no complaint was filed against the applicant in actual validity of his order and any provocateur's petition was filed by the applicant. No malicious complaint was filed. In the present case, neither the Supreme Court nor any High Court was moved against the Petitoo by the President, the Senate or the National Assembly, nor did the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Movement against him. No action. The petitioner was initiated in the present case by the Federal Tax Ombudsman as is clear in the filing of the defective order against the Federal Tax Ombudsman, pursuing the procedure under section 10 of the establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000. I was unsuccessful. No notice was issued to the applicant, nor was he given any opportunity to make recommendations that affected the federal tax ombudsman who defied the principles of natural justice.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
