Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 392/397/34, with the intent to commit robbery or robbery or to cause death or serious injury; The driver is threatened. The weapons bus was threatening to remove the latter from the bus because their money was complained to by the complainant as there was a delay of seven (7) days despite the distance between the locations of the incident. After the FIR was filed. And the police station was one (1) kilometer. The complainant, who lodged an FIR, did not witness the incident and the FIR was registered at the discretion of his driver and was accepted and recorded. That the accused remained in police custody for a long time, but nothing could be escaped from the investigation, and the complainant's driver stated in his statement under Section 161, CR PC that he did not see any weapons during the incident. ? The complainant did not mention the names of the accused in his statement, and clearly stated that he did not see the accused with weapons, neither the accused were arrested on the spot nor any independent witnesses. They were quoted when quoting. The suspect was not placed in the identity parade, the complainant's driver admitted that he could not identify the accused, therefore, the question was how did the complainant know their names and nominated them in the FIR What was the case, when he (the complainant) witnessed the incident, was one of the accused's case inquiry and accordingly he was granted bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
