Find a Lawyer

MUHAMAMD ANWAR HUSSAIN versus MST. HAMEEDA BEGUM

Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Applicants The tenant is allowed to evacuate due to the personal need of the landlord; the tenant (applicant) denied the relationship to the landlord and the tenant and said The landlord has filed a similar case against him before. Was rejected and the current case was affected by the Res Judeta principle. The confession was that the alleged landlord had previously filed a lawsuit against the tenant without permission to file a new one, and the alleged tenancy agreement was between the tenant and the other person and is nowhere It is mentioned that the name of the alleged landlord was later leased to the alleged landlord but he did not ask the tenant to evacuate nor asked for a new tenancy agreement. The alleged landlord cannot establish a relationship between the landlord and the tenant. Under the constitutional application was allowed, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Syed NUSRAT NASIR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2013 PTD 486
• YAWER KADIR v. BANKING COURT NO.V, PAKISTAN SECRETARIAT, KARACHI 2013 CLD 488
• Shaikh MUHAMMAD AAMIR v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary 2013 PLD 488
• RIZWAN MEHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2013 YLR 489
• GHULAM NABI NAREJO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 499
• Syed TARIQ SALEEM v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2013 YLR 504
• NASEEM BAZ KHAN v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2013 CLD 504
• KALI KHAN v. BODLO 2013 CLC 507

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Kot Addu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes