SHAIKH MUHAMMAD AAMIR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
Article 489F Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 561A & 154 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Honestly Issuing a Check Ending the Constitution Petition Proceeding With the mutual agreement, issuing a Check Scope Indented Check will not do so. Any bank that was presented without the written permission of the drawer (ie the issuer of the check) issued ten invalid checks to the complaining company, and each check has a confirmation on its back. In which it was stated that the consensus was that the company would not present it to anyone. The bank submitted two checks to a bank without the complainant's complaint to the company, without the written permission of the accused. They were dishonored under 489F, the PPC filed a case against the accused Palia saying that the checks were issued with the clear understanding that till then Or will go unless it obtains written consent, so neither has any dishonesty been attracted to him or the contents of section 489F, PPC, are filed by the FIR As a result of the company's dishonor, on various dates the accused had entered into a contract with the condition that they would not be presented without their written permission, which was the condition that the complaining company accepted without objection. What, therefore, was totally unauthorized to present a check without the written consent of the accused and would not bring such an offer into the shame of issuing dishonesty. Checks were not issued by the accused for payment, no successful trial was conducted against the accused. This is possible even if applied to the FIR
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
