Exempt from the section 10 (d) and 16A conviction, the scope of the scope bar on the waiver by section 10 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the former effect scope suspect was arrested in the year 1996 and initially special Was put on trial before. The Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984, was established under the Criminal Tribunal and at that time they were entitled to pre-arrest amnesty and then the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (NAB Ordinance). has been transferred. The Accountability Court formed under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 the Accountability Court formally prosecuted the accused and convicted him and sentenced him to 12 years imprisonment that he was arrested before the issuance of the NAB Ordinance. Was heard. , The provisions of section 10 (d) of the said ordinance, which may prohibit the impunity of offenders, shall not be enforced. On the date of his arrest, he was entitled to a waiver of the sentence, both before and after the sentence, according to the rules of the prison, so his right may be charged with the accuracy of the NAB Ordinance 10. He is entitled to a waiver of the sentence before and after his arrest and his trial was commenced before the insertion of section 10 (d) in the NAB Ordinance, therefore, his right of immunity in law was already in law. After a change, the penalty was given. The clear intention to make such a difference did not have the effect of depriving the accused of the right to commit the crime when the crime was committed and the trial of Section 10 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance. Beginning, not even 1999, suggest that his ex
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
