Sections 497 and 345 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 395/41 robbery, obtaining a burglary of fraudulently stolen property, the defendant allegedly complying with a compromise grant for a non-compound offense. And seized the cash from his wife. Thereafter the accused and the complainant reached an agreement and their terms and conditions were changed in writing under the contract agreement, which was signed by the complainant and the terms and conditions of the accused complainant agreement. If there was no objection to being fully satisfied, the accused persons were admitted to the Public Prosecutor's bail to confirm that the crime involved was unauthorized, so the accused cannot be guaranteed even though the accused is not authorized to be charged. But the parties were reluctant to resolve their dispute by executing the agreement. ? Giving them a sense of respect, so that they can benefit from it. The complainant and his spouse were doctors, diplomats, so educated people, who understand the terms of the settlement if the complainant's losses were handled to the satisfaction of the accused. Then there is no harm in bailing the accused. The complainant had clearly stated that because of the settlement he did not intend to prosecute the accused and further accused persons were admitted on bail with the observation that if the complainant returned the bail in the complaint It will be in his favor if you file an application to take it, if the accused party is reluctant to do so. Of a settlement agreement
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
