Find a Lawyer

MST. NAJMA PARVEEN versus GHULAM JANNAT

Section 32, 30 and 46 of the petition filed by the mother of the man and the wife of the mentally abusive man regarding the petition filed for the appointment of the manager were disputed by the court because of her husband's absence. The great find was wrong. The mentally impaired Waldity Court examined the man and presented medical evidence to prove that he was mentally unwell, the medical board had unanimously compiled the report and the same evidence was shown. The witness appeared in the box and was examined to find he was not interested. And the medical board's report was enough to prove the person's illness that the court had to take care of the protected person and the mother was the best person to take care of her son, because no one was against him. There was no negative interest. There was nothing illegal in the illegal order and the mother was rightly appointed manager of men's property The appeal of the most offensive person was dismissed, under circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ALI RAZA v. State 2013 PLD 651
• AFTAB ALAM v. State 2013 PLD 655
• Syed FEROZE SHAH GHILLANI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 659
• Mst. SAMINA BEGUM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 660
• Mst. ZAHIDA SULTANA v. DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY LAHORE 2013 PLD 663
• PAK MOBILE COMMUNICATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 667
• BARKAT ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 668
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2013 YLR 672

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Zhob lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes