SAEED AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Evidence of Removal of Tenant Landlord and Tenant Relationships Exclusion and Tax Revenue Record The eviction request filed by the landlord was dismissed by the tenant controller on the ground that the lower appellate court had dismissed them. Results reversed. The order of eviction against the tenant controller and the tenant player was approved by the tenant, saying that the excise and taxation documents on the payment of property tax were not sufficient to prove the relationship between the landlord and the tenant. However, department excise and tax revenue documents may not be final. Proof of establishing a landlord and tenant relationship but at the same time they were not irrelevant as the documents provided in the form of a sale agreement by the landlord, along with the ownership and payment of the property tax Oral, And taxation documentation documents were included. The payment of the property by property tax and queries from the landlords proved that the landlord owned the house in connection with the house and the applicant was a subordinate tenant. The tenant could not take advantage of the position to frustrate the eviction proceedings on the ground that the landlord's property was not a defaulted property, especially since he could not prove his title and any other property ownership. If the claimant was not, the High Court refused to intervene in the eviction order passed by the lower appellate court against the tenant's constitutional request.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
