Delay in filing a non-recording of evidence by prosecution, despite lengthy delays in criminal breach of section 561A, 249A and 344 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), speedy litigation FI R was the defendant's right. The PPC petition, filed against the accused under section 6406, was dismissed by the trial court under section 249A, CRPC. The amendment court issued arrest warrants for the arrest of witnesses at the trial. The complainant has moved from the country internally, which is why it is understood that neither complainant nor his witnesses submitted for more than three years, the law required that an accused Should be prosecuted. At the appropriate time, the instant trial was correct in Article 344 of the accused, the PC adjourned the court and the trial could not be postponed without any good reason. Continuing the trial is like misusing legal proceedings and wasting valuable court time because in this case there is no possibility of conviction. Due to the absence of evidence, the impugned orders passed by the trial court and the reviewing court were set aside and the FIR proceedings before the trial court were dropped and application was granted accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
