The trial court ruled in this case that the plaintiff in the title of the Limitation of Limitation Act (IX of 8, 1908), the sale of the suit land made by his brother in favor of the shopkeepers. But the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and affirmed the nomination registered sale deed. On 2 2 1968, the possession of the suit land was handed over to the shopkeepers at the same time and the withdrawal was also added to the record by certified mutation on 27 8 1968. The transfer of possession cannot be suspected of the plaintiff's knowledge of the matter in question from the outset, in terms of Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the plaintiff may challenge this transaction with a fixed period of six years from the date of registration. Was. In this case, the sale, which was 20 2 1968, was sued on 21-2 1975, almost seven years after that. The case filed by the plaintiff was barred and the outcome of the lower appellate court was safeguarded in this regard, with no scope for interference. The High Court found no legal or factual weakness in the lower appellate court decision. And another appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
