MST. ZAHIDA SULTANA versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY LAHORE
Regln 2 (y) Defense Housing Authority Lahore Order (26 of 2002) [F No 2 (4) / 2002 Pub date 19 9 2002)], Article 7 (1) (j) Constitution of Pakistan, Art, 199 Constitution Petition Amanity Plot The commercial use of the residential plot in the residential area for commercial use was owned by the Executive Board of Defense Housing Authority, a house in the residential zone of the Scope Petitioner's Options Defense Housing Authority (DHA \) and by this decision Used to avoid The applicant believed that the Executive Board was illegally commercializing a convenience plot located in a residential area, which was designated to convert the adjacent plot of the DHA's Executive Board into a commercial plaza as a "parking area." Converting to a valid parking area for use, in question, was located in a residential area and was included in Regln 2 (y) of the Defense Housing Authority's Construction and Development Code, any commercial buildings within the definition of parking space definition. Were not tions, 2007 and adjusted traffic flows from nearby mosques and schools and was open for use by a public parking plaza, if built on the said land, it would be a public service facility for visitors and visitors. This promotes access to the area. Its availability to the public space for parking space, therefore, was a prosperous project in the light of the Parking Space Defense Housing Authority's Construction and Development Code, 2007 and the Law, Parking Area, for any commercial or commercial activity. Did not host There was no commercial plot and DHAKE under Article 7 (1) (J) Defense Housing Authority Lahore Order, 2002
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
