Find a Lawyer

SAIFULLAH CHEEMA versus CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, AITCHISON COLLEGE, LAHORE

Section 2 (AA), 3, 5, 8 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 removed the appellant from the job with the order of the college principal serving as a teacher from the college. went. The allegation of misconduct against the appellant was that he had beaten a student when he was taking a class due to his misconduct under college rules developed by the Board of Governors. That is, the subcommittee had full authority to appoint and remove all members of the teaching staff. And the principals can only take disciplinary action against a teacher who did not have the authority to dismiss or dismiss the college principal; his jurisdiction against the appellant came to a halt. Couldn't submit a notification. Assigning powers to appoint Masters / Teachers or to delegate powers to the Principal of the College on this occasion (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 provided that the hearing was violated under section 8 of the Punjab Removal by violating the mandatory provisions of the Act. , Violation of mandatory provision of law, the appellant was not heard and no order specifically violating the rules requiring the hearing of the appellant was issued. This can be retained by providing the opportunity under the rules, no doubt that the appellant was physically punished for the complaining student, but for the abusive, abusive, and most humiliating behavior with the appellant. I did not take any action which was a highly respected teacher. Without providing the opportunity for an unauthorized and appellant hearing by the principal law websites from Wahi hassain lawyer