Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Aadid Testimony Benefits of Suspicion All four accused were acquitted by the trial court on the benefit of the doubt and their fate was brought to an end. The question was whether the evidence was denied. That can be believed against the accused. The motive for the incident was attributed not only to the accused but also to the accompanying accomplices, the reports of the Franz Science Laboratory regarding the rifles recovered from the accused were only to the extent that they were in working condition. I was there and the injured person was not specifically assigned to any of the accused persons and the accused was jointly designated as well as their accompanying associate accused. It was reported that there was no free revision on record from any quarter to distinguish his case. The co-accused, who were acquitted, also had the benefit of the doubt and were acquitted in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• SAFDAR HUSSAIN v. SUB-DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER 2013 MLD 347
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 2013 CLD 349
• SULTAN alias SULLI v. State 2013 YLR 350
• Raja MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN v. ACTING VICE-CHANCELLOR 2013 PLC(CS) 353
• Sh. MUNIR AHMAD v. State 2013 YLR 359
• MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ v. State 2013 YLR 370
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. CIVIL JUDGE/RENT TRIBUNAL, RAJANPUR 2013 MLD 371
• IMTIAZ AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 374

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

online advocate from Tando Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes