NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU versus KHALID AHMAD KHAN KHARRAL
Section 9 (a) (iv) and 32 Corruption and Corruption Practices Unlawful Benefit, Appeal Against the Evidence of Evidence Another view of the Men's Re-Proof Evidence Act under Section 9 (a) (iv) of the National Accountability Ordinance Was imposed. 1999, after recording evidence, the accused acquitted of contracting the construction of the memorial and trial court, none of the prosecution witnesses said a word against the conduct, as well as the criminal intentions of the accused. If he had ever tried to oblige the contractor, there was no evidence on record in relation to any financial benefit extended by the defendant in favor of any contract in the course of awarding the contract, or Section 9 itself. (a) (iv) obtained such unlawful benefit as a result of the sanction of contractual indemnity. ) The National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, was not properly proven by the trial court; a case of innocence was always in favor of the accused at the trial stage and the poultry court of competent jurisdiction passed the order. What had happened, such speculation doubled, and the trial court was acquitted after giving up its fair-mindedness to present the same unforgivable evidence, and once the verdict was acquitted, the jurisdiction after the appropriate court. Was approved by the court. The proper scrutiny of the evidence, therefore, cannot be interrupted simply because a second view can be taken on the analysis of the evidence. The High Court dismissed the appeal in the trial case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
