ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus BAKE LINE PRODUCTS
Section 27, Interpretation of Typographical or Scientific Errors The Circuit Suit for Recovery of the Frase Molvi or Typographical Mistake, The Banking Court Decided Under Plaintiff's Request (Finance) Ordinance 2001 Under Section 27 Of The Financial Institutions. In relation to the markup calculation and the receivable amount, the injunction was dismissed, the plaintiff's bank held that the term of the clerical error was a broader concept and it covered the current case situation which Due to the validity of the judgment of the banking court, it was disclosed that the banking court made its decision after considering the arguments and there was no concealment and in deciding the plaintiff's bank request under section 27 of the Ordinance. The court affirmed its first decision of the banking court, challenging the appeal. But it did not give any impression of error or calories. Calorie error means that any error that is corrected does not change the effect of the central order, and if an error is corrected, Whether there is an increase or decrease in liability, the same shall be subject to review of the judgment, which was not covered under section 27. The increase in ordinance did not result from typographical error or error correction or typographical error, review or correction of any error, which altered the destiny of judgment and decree, was beyond the scope of section 27 of the financial institutions. The Finance of Ordinance, 2001, in which a very limited application was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
