Article 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Dover, Dowry Articles, Recovery Allowance and Recovery of Delivery Expenses Wife (Defendant) Husband (Applicant) did not challenge the amount of Maintenance Allowance as requested below. I have been decided by the courts, but the objection was also made to the 20% annual increase in the said allowance. And their prices were not mentioned in the list of dowry articles displayed in court. The Validity Petitioner failed to present his salary allowances to establish that a 20% annual increase in care allowance was beyond his means, causing the younger son to have a special child. The wife had to spend a lot on her medical treatment. This fact was also accepted by an applicant. The eyewitnesses, in view of which, the wives proved the list of dowry articles, hence the wives proved the list of dowry articles, and they also received various receipts in connection with the purchase of dowry articles. Were presented. The husband had failed to identify any unlawful interference or irregularity in the results obtained with the trial court and the appellate court below, his application was dismissed. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
