Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE

Section 42 Law Inquiries (10 of 1984), Art 85 and 140 Suit for Declaration by the Revenue Staff Unlawfully Conduct Inquiry proceedings with statements conducting inquiry proceedings against Revenue staff The record of such investigative proceedings was sought by the plaintiff to meet with the Revenue staff when they call as officers. The objection is that defendants / Income Tax staff should not be called as witnesses; their statements in the inquiry proceedings cannot be recorded in a valid document prepared by a public servant. Being a public document would not be necessary to prove the fulfillment of his official duties, the record documents / statements sought to be kept on record in his statement by the record keeper were the same as the Inquiry Officer's inquiry officer. Was executed at the time of the inquiry. Without recording such statements / documents, its official duties would be to defend defendants from the defendants at the time of writing their statements to defendants.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• RASHID ALI v. State 2013 MLD 843
• NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU v. KHALID AHMAD KHAN KHARRAL 2013 MLD 849
• SHAKIL MEHMOOD v. DISTRICT JUDGE, SIALKOT 2013 YLR 852
• MIAN KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 856
• Rana SIKANDER HAYAT v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation and Power, Punjab 2013 CLC 868
• Syed AZHAR ABBAS v. State 2013 MLD 869
• FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ORIENT ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS AND CONTRACTORS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD 2013 CLD 871
• ASHRAF ALI alias JAMAT ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 872

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

pakistani advocates Sheikhupura lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes