RANA SIKANDER HAYAT versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND POWER, PUNJAB
R16 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Questions about Constitutional Dispute Resolution Availability of alternative methods for resolving disputes; The issue concerning the election of the chairman of the area Water Beard was a candidate for the post of chairman. That he and his opponent (the defendant) received equal votes during both elections, but the competent authority declared the opposition candidate as the chairman's choice because of political influence, the answer from the respondents was that the applicant. He did not even present his candidacy for the chairmanship of the board. The application for a justification was completely denied by the respondents, therefore, disputed factual disputes arose, which required the recording of evidence to resolve them, in which case the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction Otherwise, otherwise, Rule 16 (2) of the Punjab Irrigation and Drainage Authority (Pilot Farmers Organization) Rules, 2005 provided that such a remedy for dispute resolution, which was created during the election process, was applied by such applicant. To no avail was the constitutional application not sustained in any case and therefore with this observation It was rejected that the applicant is free to take advantage of the treatment available to him. In accordance with the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
