Find a Lawyer

TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SHAHPUR versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintenance Enforcement Regulation Policy Reality Controversy Applicant Local Government Builds Shops on Real Estate and Respondents were Tenants in Shops who were Paying Rent to Applicants Provincial Government Proposed Regulation Policy Under Private Government The agreement decided to sell the land to the respondents. The applicant was not obliged to sell the land under the shops because the owner had the property to sell to his property person to get the maximum value of his land. After inquiring the provincial government came to the conclusion that the respondents had spent building their shops. While he was entitled to transfer land ownership rights under his funds and shops as payment for market value, the 10% surcharge applicant could not force the provincial government to sell his property as his manager, disputing the question. The truth cannot be solved. The Constitution and the High Court in the PE said that the jurisdiction was unable to investigate the facts whether the applicant had constructed shops or required a deep inquiry into such claims of the respondents who had recorded and recorded the evidence. And since such a request was not maintained.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ASHIQ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFARGARH 2013 CLC 1033
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. ALI MUHAMAMD 2013 YLR 1035
• Mst. SURRAYIA TABBASUM v. Subedar Major FAZAL KARIM 2013 YLR 1039
• ZAHIDA PARVEEN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1043
• UMAR FAROOQ v. State 2013 YLR 1046
• FAIZULLAH v. MUHAMMAD SARWAR 2013 CLC 1054
• Mst. AZIM KHATOON v. Mst. JINDAN 2013 YLR 1055
• Mst. RUKHSANA BIBI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION CANTT. MULTAN 2013 PCrLJ 1055

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

list of advocates from Lasbela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes