ASHIQ MUHAMMAD KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFARGARH
Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VI, R 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Amendment to the Constitution Application Not to mention the date, time and place of trial for the effect of the former umpire was the trial court and lower. ? The appellate court did not allow him to amend his claimant. By incorporating history, time and place into legalizing the place of the victim, premature right to self-determination was a very weak right and one had to meet the imperative to succeed. In this case, the students required in Section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Empathy Act, 1991, did not disclose the date, time and place of making the interpretation, which was fatal in the pre-emption suit. Earlier it was fatal for the umpire to mention the required details of RBS and there was no defect and was not defective which could be fixed by filing an application under O VI, completing Rule 17, CPC trial court. Appeal Court dismissed the pre-emptor's request for amendment, which was properly maintained by the lower appellate court, as the pre-emptor in his constitutional jurisdiction ordered the intervention of the High Court. Failed to identify any type of illegal or irregularities
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
