Find a Lawyer

MST. SURRAYIA TABBASUM versus SUBEDAR MAJOR FAZAL KARIM

Section & b & 27 (b) Sue for the Acquisition of Occupied Real Estate Buyers, Plaintiffs Claims to Remain the Principles of Same Reality by the Two Courts That It Was Suited by the Sale Deed Registered in the Year, 1967 The land was purchased and the defendants forcibly seized. To be a sincere buyer for valuable consideration, the defendant did not create a title in his favor or create any interest in his interests. Earlier, things sold in favor of the plaintiffs of both courts were contrary to the admitted fact and were not sustainable in the eyes of the law. The court put aside all the concurrent decisions made by the two courts under the exercise of jurisdiction, and the case filed by the plaintiff was rejected in favor of it.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• AZGARD NINE LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary 2013 PTD 1030
• ZARINA BIBI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1031
• ASHIQ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFARGARH 2013 CLC 1033
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. ALI MUHAMAMD 2013 YLR 1035
• ZAHIDA PARVEEN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1043
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SHAHPUR v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2013 MLD 1045
• UMAR FAROOQ v. State 2013 YLR 1046
• FAIZULLAH v. MUHAMMAD SARWAR 2013 CLC 1054

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocate from Dhirkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes