MST. RUKHSANA BIBI versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CANTT. MULTAN
Statement of Constitution of Pakistan, Section 199 Constitutional Application Habeas Corporates Request for Recovery of Minor / Detention Forum, Determination of Detention / Underage Commitment in a District Associated with the Principal Seat of the High Court Mother, Before This Bench The High Court, which filed for the minor's recovery, where the minor was allegedly snatched by his father, was moved by his father to a different district, where he was allegedly detained. Was. The mother claimed that the High Court had jurisdiction over the entire province, therefore, a petition for the recovery of the minor could be filed before the High Court Bench, from which the minor was allegedly stripped of the province. All the appellate areas of the High Court came under the criminal jurisdiction but various areas were attached to the High Court Principal Sets and Benches. In view of the convenience of the public plea of litigation under Section 491, the CCP may be lodged in the appellate jurisdiction of the Bench where, in the present case, the minor was detained illegally or illegally. Was allegedly illegally detained in a district, which was attached to the principal seat of the High Court, and therefore, it was beneficial for the elimination of justice. The present petition for removal of juveniles at the Principal Setplace was ineligible for hearing under Section 491, CCPC or Article 199 of the Constitution for the purpose of authorizing the present constitutional petition with this observation. It was settled that the mother could file her petition. In front of a session judge or
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
