Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ALI MUHAMAMD

The trial court ruled that the trial court's decision to deliver the section 13 tablet making notice, the suit for trial before the trial, was upheld, but said the trial court's order was upheld by the appellate court. Legally there was no mention of information about the plaintiff's unsold sale. The plaintiff's claim to satisfy the date, time and location of the petitioner was also missing from the statement of the plaintiff, as the witness shopkeepers / defendants were not presented in the evidence proving the confession and therefore there was no defect in it. was not. Appeal Court revision order dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. State 2013 MLD 1029
• AZGARD NINE LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary 2013 PTD 1030
• ZARINA BIBI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1031
• ASHIQ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFARGARH 2013 CLC 1033
• Mst. SURRAYIA TABBASUM v. Subedar Major FAZAL KARIM 2013 YLR 1039
• ZAHIDA PARVEEN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1043
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SHAHPUR v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2013 MLD 1045
• UMAR FAROOQ v. State 2013 YLR 1046

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

ask a advocate free from Theing Jattan More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes