Sections 497 (2) and 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 411 of robbery, obtaining interim pre-arrest bail for fraudulently stolen property; The complainant was accused of entering the house. He took hostages from the house and looted several valuables at gunpoint. The accused's name was not listed in the FIR nor was there before the prosecution witnesses. In the statements, he applied to the police in the request that he was robbed. The CCPC, against the brother of a witness in the accused's case, said that the witness may have been prejudiced against the accused at the tip of the gun on four unidentified gunmen who began proceedings under Sections 107 and 151. Must have been hunting. Failure to collect any pertinent evidence against the accused and rely on the statements of the co-accused who allegedly declared the accused to be their partner During the incident, Millipin complained that the complainant was next door The neighbor may have indicated the link between the suspect and the designated co-accused on the cell phone call logs of the suspect, but all this happened only in cases where there was no evidence. It is believed that on the complainant's statement that the accused had subjected his co-accused to the commission of the crime, the accused's case was open for further investigation, the accused's approved ad interim pre-arrest bail was confirmed. I \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
