Find a Lawyer

ZAID SULTAN versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (AGRICULTURE), MULTAN

Section 3 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) After serving with the charge sheet to the appellant for dismissing the appellant, it is alleged that his appointment is on the divisional cadre and not on the district cadre. ? The Recruitment Committee, which selected him, was not authorized to do so, so that no allegation could be made with the appellant, because the authority is acting because it is not appropriated by the appointing committee and authority from the appellant who opts outside the district. There was no irregularity that led to the appointment. There was no allegation against the appellant that the appellant was manipulated with a domicile to enter service until the appellant was employed in 1993, almost 11 years later to initiate disciplinary proceedings. I was too late Because his entry into the service was dubious, appointing appellant by misrepresented recruits was not a headache for the appellant committee for which he could not be charged once It was recognized that the appellant had the required qualifications, he could not be punished after serving more than 10 years without being accused of mismanagement. One way and it was ordered to be restored with full back-up benefits \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Wahi hassain lawyer