SHEIKH GHULAM RASUL versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
In Section 8 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Pro Pharma Promotion Anti-Talent Appeal Employee for Service Tribunal Promotion in B Section 18 was approved by the Appellate Division, which was considered for development. , But was fired. In 1991, after 11 years, the appellant challenged the development of the employees who claimed that the appellant was brought to his notice after 11 years of sleep deprivation of their rights. The claim that the Departmental Promotion Committee observed in 1991 that it was unreasonable to hold a second division degree at Masters could not be trusted because it failed to provoke similar provocation within the time provided under the law. And saying that he learned of the complaint 11 years later was opposed to intellect and was a public servant in 1991. This understanding of the removal of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Rawat lawyer
