Find a Lawyer

MRS. ARIFA NADEEM versus DISTRICT NAZIM CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS

Prior to the challenge to appeal the Section 9 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 District Government Rules of Business, 2001, R16, the service tribunal appellant challenged his transfer order from the position of principal to the college. And was placed in their control. The Secretary of Education asked for further posting by the District Nazim Appellant on administrative grounds that she had not yet completed her three-year term and that her transfer had been transferred and the appellant during the restriction on transfer. Claimed that the District Nazim was not capable of transferring the appellant under R16 of the District Government Rules of Business 2001, as the Rules of Business stated that the District Nazim was only entitled to order transfer in the district while he was the district Was moved out and can only be posted by the Secretary of Education anywhere. In the present case, the transfer of the district out of the district was carried out by the district Nazi M. and the POR had created a riot. Providing the services of an officer under the authority of the provincial government would mean that the district powers of the district Nazim were transferred only to their own While confined to the district, the matter was remanded to the Secretary Education so that it was permanent and independent and the decision on the representation of the appellant as per the requirements of public interest was strictly in accordance with the law. how to become a advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer