Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH SAJJAD RIAZ versus SENIOR MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE/SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND A

Section 3, 4 (1) (b) (iv) and 5 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Services Appellate Appellant serving as the resignation officer, after he has been charged. Dismissed on charges of certain illegal charges. And the anomalies in the stabilization proceedings, even though the evidence on the record proved that the stability was in the process of stabilization, the main responsibility for the deviation was with Patwari, who has been told that fraud and others. A conviction was made on the basis of the allegations in which the appellant performed his monitoring. Act properly as a consolidation officer, except that he was not careful as a supervising officer, appellant's assertion that Patwari had tampered with the record and forged the appellant's signature. They were not denied the authority (punctuality and discipline) under the Punjab Government employees. The Rules, 1999 were not implemented properly because the ADC (G) could not function as an officer officer because the rule was not available as the authorized officer's scheme was not available as well as the respondents along with the shortage of appellant. Investigation of the Rules and Procedures has proved that no harm was caused to the appellant in the original nor can it be attributed to any intentional cause. Unfortunately, the appellant was not involved. The mischief and his record of 14 years of impeccable service also showed that he could not be expected to be involved in any defect, however, the appellant showed some laziness in his caretaker role. top advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer