Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ EX-CONSTABLE NO.366, TEHSIL SAHIWAL, DISTRICT SARGODHA versus D.P.O. KHUSHAB

R 4 (1) (b) (v) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Appellant's charge of excluding Appellant from service went on to the point that he was absent from duty for 10 days. While passing an unknown order on the dismissal of the appellant, the period of absence was also considered as a leave without pay, when the absence was considered as leave without pay, the appellant was not considered absent. And at least he cannot be dismissed on the grounds that the appellant is treated absent. , Then he could not be treated on leave and if he was to be treated on leave, then he could not be treated as absent. Further, the appellant alleged that his absence had been stated. During the time he became ill and he submitted. Medical certificates for the period, but stated that the medical certificates were misplaced, the appellant was not given a personal hearing as it was the right of everyone to be heard in a case while passing an inappropriate order. The accused person authority cannot declare that the appellant is not entitled to a personal hearing grant, accept the appeal of the appellant, defective orders were set and the appellant was reinstated to the job and the interim period was discharged. Will be considered as immigration advocates contact from Shujabad lawyer