Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH GONDAL versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, RAWALPINDI

He was charged after sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 and 25 mandatory retirement appeal discrimination and the application of double risk rule to Major Criminal Charge of compulsory retirement. Misconduct, Corruption, Corruption, Negligence: Out of six allegations of misappropriation of money, negligence, etc., five allegations of past wrongdoing for which the appellant was convicted and it became a closed and past transaction. No action could be taken to impose. Essentially, a preliminary inquiry into an allegation of a significant retirement penalty was made and no showcase notice or personal hearing was provided; There was evidence to the contrary, but in this case they were imposed solely on the slightest penalty, while the mandatory retirement penalty was imposed on appellant because of the penalties imposed on the appellant. While in the case of the co-accused appellant, the mandatory retirement sentence was changed to censor. A, who was already facing trial and was convicted on five charges related to past wrongs, and said that administrative errors had already been decided against him, he must be retired. The new action taken under the allegations of torture cannot be sustained, as in the Appellant's case a double risk rule applies that no one was required to panic twice. And partial possession of the appellant's appeal for the same offense immigration advocates from Fateh Pur lawyer