MUHAMMAD BOOTA JAVED versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
After compulsory retirement appeals from Articles 3, 5, 6 and 10, the employee was charged a substantial fine of mandatory retirement after charging a charge sheet for allegations of misconduct and misconduct with the employee, the main accused, who was the district health officer. , Was given a minor restraining order. Of the two receipts, which were the most appropriate fines in the circumstances given in the case, the appellants, who were lower-ranking officials, were not only discriminated against, but also charged with discrimination. The imposition was beyond the grave nature of the mismanagement. Implemented, in the case of imposing penalties for the restoration of equality, the two receipts were changed to prevent the mandatory retirement penalty imposed on the appellants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Topi lawyer