Find a Lawyer

TAHIR AZIZ versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, BAHAWALPUR

R4 (1) (b) (iv) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), after the dismissal of section 4 appellate lawyers, they were issued notices because there were some negative entries in their service. The record further states that they were not considered fit for further retention in service. Appellant's service record consisted mostly of stopping warnings, censorship, and encroachment, primarily because some cases of absence from duty were already punished by Petty. Crimes related to irregularities cannot be a major penalty for removal. From employment to employment through the cumulative effect of previous convictions - allegations of negligence, etc. against the appellant were vague and the unspecified public servant could not be prosecuted for vague and unspecified allegations. Or the previous minor conviction he received, the unprivileged orders were set aside and accordingly the appellant was re-presented. \ R \ n best law firms from FR DI Khan lawyer