GHULAM HUSSAIN versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (M.E.E) LAHORE CITY, LAHORE
Section 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the removal of section 4 from the service appellant appellant was appointed PTC teacher, but he was on duty within the appellant after a period of five months and 12 days. I was not involved in which a fake adjustment order was issued by the district. The Education Officer, who was not in any way eligible to issue an Adjustment Order because the issuance of this order was only in the capacity of the Deputy District Education Officer. Such Adjustment Order was not registered in any register which the appellant received. Bogus Adjustment Order Bribed By Obtaining Appellant Through Fake Sources, He Will Not Simply Admit The Arms That He Learned In School For The Long Term 10/11 A rigorous dismissal of the job after teaching, will prevent any previous fraud that is firmly established. Over time, fraud will not be eliminated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Fizagat lawyer
