Find a Lawyer

ASIF JAMIL versus CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB TEXT BOOK BOARD

Rr 3 (b) and 4 (1) (iii) (v) of the Punjab Service Tribunal Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 was dismissed by the appellant after dismissing him on charges of corruption. Conduct investigation against him on charges of massive financial irregularities - serious allegations of financial irregularities including damages The petitioner was charged against the Board of Appeals, the Appellate Inquiry Committee charged against the appellant. Considering and finding that the allegations were proved, some contradictions were found on the one hand in the inquiry committee's inquiry. The Inquiry Committee stated that - financial irregularities were dealt with by the appellant and, on the other hand, the committee concluded that the appellant was guilty of incompetence and that the corruption should have precluded the exact loss of the committee. Appellant for the Board of Defendants or he should have waited for the final report of the auditors to determine the correct contamination, because the appellant was not innocent as his role delayed the completion of the inquiry within a fixed period. Will not affect the whole proceedings in a bad way The Inquiry Committee concluded that the appellant was incompetent and subject to corruption. Therefore, according to the conclusion of the inquiry committee, the appellant should have been punished, the dismissal of the job was changed to a mandatory retirement from employment, accordingly the order of dismissal was amended. \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firm from Shedani sharif lawyer