Find a Lawyer

FARAH DEEBA versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LABOUR AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4, after the charge sheet for dismissal of the appellant from the service of a school principal and against him in the office record tampering. He was removed from the job following an inquiry into the allegations. After a thorough scrutiny of the documentary evidence on the record and examination of the witnesses, the inquiry officer has been found guilty of misconduct and his misconduct that the allegations against the appellant have been substantiated and the inquiry officer has kept the inquiry report in mind. The service had recommended a major penalty for removal from the appeal authority. And after hearing the appellant's argument, the appellant himself was a master of fraud and manipulation by the appellant was ugly, it was very shocking and traumatic because it was impossible to imagine that the principal. Working as a teacher will go down so much. Take advantage of the time that has to be given to teachers who are not only looking to mold young students, but also to combine their merits as a role model for their contemporary principal to become a role model. , Which can cross all limits, to the slightest advantage, but it will not fail completely. Appellant deserves to be held so high that Article 13 of the Constitution pertaining to the double jeopardy rule was violated, it was abrogated because it was stated that this rule only applies where the law The competent court should either acquit the accused or sentence him. Could not stand trial for the same crime - Sid Roll / Maxim K famous high court advocate from Burewala lawyer