Find a Lawyer

SYED GHULAM MURTAZA versus SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 9 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the transfer of the Appellant's Section 4 to the Appellant for the Service Tribunal was challenged to transfer their transfer from the place of employment to the working M working place. The workplace was moved to L ma and the transfer policy against was the appellant. Retired at the expiration of his sentence only 8 months after the transfer order passed and, when the appellant was appealed for a hearing of about 3 months before reaching the instability age, he was asked. The appellant was transferred as a result of the inquiry. The disciplinary grounds against it and it was reasonable to assume that the matter should be investigated elsewhere. Then, if the appellant was corrupt, according to the allegations leveled against him, the place M idity would then be offered to replace him with a diverse selection. It may also be subject to its mismanagement in a place that has never been the spirit of law, and can be initiated and disciplined on disciplinary grounds. Appellant, in the same place where he allegedly committed wrongdoing and commissions until otherwise the appellant was suspended, could be suspended, could not be recovered from the record and feared that Documents may have been tampered with, this matter could not be considered. If he remains in the post of appellant, action has been taken against him. M \ 's fact that the appellant had brought an appeal against his transfer from lant M place, indicated that he intends to spend his retirement life on IM and transfer. The policy is so convenient when you need a advocate from Khuzdar lawyer