Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN NAQSHBANDI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 10 (1) Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) after suspension of service At the completion of two years of the termination case, the applicant was of the view that such an order could not be granted without issuing a show cause notice. And that at the expiration of two years of the trial period, she automatically stood up to confirm that the tribunal had affirmed the applicant's appeal. The total period of testing under R7 of 1974, the Civil Civil Servant of Punjab, was four years, which was not possible. This will not raise the question of going ahead / automatic certification of, because in the absence of an order at the expiry of the initial two years, it will be considered that it has been extended for another two years. Therefore, it was expressly accepted that, no termination of applicant's services, including disqualification or corruption was imposed, cancellation would be a matter of simplicity ?? Show cause notice issued before such termination. There is no question to be raised. Even the competent authority was not required to have been issued to the High Court that it could not be compelled to reinstate or confirm the applicant, both the Q&A and the certification depended exclusively on the individual's personal assessment. Yes, what aspect of the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court, the discrimination decision was strictly in line with the principles of justice, there was no question of public importance, the Supreme Court dismissed and refused. Leave to appeal divorce advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer