Find a Lawyer

SHAH JEHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 4 and 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) demand for bribe money by the accused on the instruction of the accused to pay the same to the accused and his accomplices. The demand for recovery from the evidence was certified by an independent and credible witness who had no ill will or any hostility against the accused, and his testimony cannot be denied when the complainant and the magistrate or the Circle Officer In the presence of such evidence, the witness's testimony could not be denied after hearing the statement. Unusual, which was neither a prerequisite to a raid case nor a requirement of law that the co-accused confessed to receiving money from the complainant on the instruction of the accused, Prevention was considered under Section 4. The Corruption Act, 1947, thus, was the alibi's indictment against the Pilia taken by the accused, forged by his own statement, and defense evidence supported the prosecution's cases. w On the proper definition of evidence the sentence was properly punished and the accused was given leave of appeal on the basis of which the accused was denied. list of advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer