Find a Lawyer

ZIA GHAFOOR PIRACHA versus CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, RAWALPINDI

Sections 12 (1) (a), 12 (8) (iii) (iv), 14; 15, 17 and 20 (1) (iii) of the Constitution of Pakistan Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975 1973), Article 185 (3) The nature of the rules of service of the employees of the board, the accuracy of the dismissal of the employees of the BoRD, different types of people were working in the board's organizational structure. Some were called officers whose terms and conditions were enforced by the governing authority, but in respect of some employees in BPS 5 to 15, according to the Service Regulations of Board No. 8, the chairman had all the powers under the law and There are also Regulation Petitioners. The Chairman of the Board was appointed as the competent authority, it was said that disciplinary action could be taken against the employees by the defaulting administration, under the Service Regulations of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act, 1976. Shall be appointed under section 12 (1) (a). The Board is not being legislated, the Board does not legalize the Service Regulations mentioned in the High Court, in accordance with the nature of the Punjab Civil Service (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975, in the circumstances the constitutional application of employees Has been rejected as. Holiday applications for appeal were dismissed immigration advocates from Lalshanra lawyer