MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus HABIB BANK LIMITED
Section 2A [as incorporated by the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Act (XVII of 1997)] and Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) removes the applicant from service and was a cashier. The commission was dismissed by the award service tribunal. Applicant appeals for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that he was an employee and not a civil servant. The Weldetty Tribunal misinterpreted and misinterpreted Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, enabling such employees to have the jurisdiction to be tribunal employees. Regardless of the position they were awarded because of Section 2A of the Act, the Competent Tribunal was competent in their cases to resolve their complaints regarding the terms and conditions of service, irrespective of the terms and conditions of service. Application. Regularly, there will rarely be a case regarding the Wage Commission Award or any other case that the Supreme Court accepted the appeal and remanded to the Tribunal for this case. The fresh impact of this decision, after giving all concerned the opportunity to be heard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer