Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH THE DIRECTOR (E.E.), LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) was based on the appointment of a public servant six years after the charge of dismissing the employees and, under political pressure, he was dismissed from the job by the government employee. Dismissed. No evidence was provided to support such allegations, no formal inquiry was made to unveil the fact that the civil servant had the requisite qualifications for the appointment of the employee as the PTC Teacher Competent Authority admitted Such an appointment was made on the recommendations of the Committee, after which the Government employee was dismissed from the service without having served six years without hearing any duty required by the Punjab Government Employees (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1973. Services without serious hearing and completion opportunities lead to serious bias and result in abortion of justice. Reasons, has been accused of such dismissal was not well-W interference Arman Supreme Court rejected the request and refused leave to appeal registration advocate from Sargodha lawyer