Find a Lawyer

SYED ALI SHAH BUKHARI versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employee, a Deputy District Attorney, must have retired from the job under the complaint / allegation, while he was appointed as such in the Additional District Judge's Court, Took Rs. 3,52,000 as a bribe in the name of the Presiding Officer, and thereby misconduct and corruption within the meaning of Section 3 (b) (c) of removing the Punjab from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 authorized authority. Compiled by Under the ordinance, the accused was ordered to initiate an inquiry against a civil servant and he was given a statement of charges. The public servant denied the inquiry officer his written defense, however the inquiry officer made a detailed inquiry. , Examined the testimony of both parties, and concluded that the accused was a civil servant accused and showed the competent authority a recommendation for his retirement, along with a copy of the report. Delivery of the notice to the civil servant after complying with Section 3 (2) of the Ordinance was given to the civil servant with compulsory retirement with all pension benefits: it was offered, against which He had filed an appeal before the service. The dismissed tribunal moved the Anti-Corruption Establishment against the civil servant, but they came under pressure from the witnesses and hope the bribe taken by the accused public servant will be returned when the anti-corruption The establishment not only stopped the proceedings. But under Section 182, PPC it was recommended to initiate proceedings against the complainant, the accused here tax advocates from Bat Khela lawyer